This section presents a professionally wirtten variation of your essay and highlights the differences.
In today's world, the tendency to migrate overseas has increased significantly among individuals. Although some feel that professionals should be kept in their home countries so as not to cause shortage, I completely agree with those who believe all people should be free to choose their work environment.
In today's world, the tendency to migrate overseas has increased significantly. Although some argue that professionals should remain in their home countries to prevent shortages, I firmly agree with those who believe individuals should have the freedom to choose their work environment.
On the one hand, it could be argued that a substantial amount of money has been dedicated to train experts by governments. The more doctors and engineers leave their own countries, the more job vacancies may be created, enforcing authorities to employ some foreign professionals as alternatives. This cycle can impose a financial burden on societies, leading to a economic crisis. Additionally, it is said that people may lose the sense of commitment to their own country when migrate abroad. To elaborate, national identity is undeniably important to both countries and individuals, making them known globally. When professionals migrate to other countries permanently, they may be influenced by the culture of their destination countries and forget about their traditions.
On the one hand, governments invest substantial resources in training experts. When doctors and engineers emigrate, it creates job vacancies, potentially forcing authorities to recruit foreign professionals as replacements. This cycle may impose financial burdens on societies, potentially leading to economic crises. Additionally, prolonged stays abroad might weaken professionals' connection to their homeland. National identity is undeniably important for both countries and individuals, serving as a global identifier. When professionals settle permanently abroad, they may assimilate into foreign cultures and gradually lose touch with their native traditions.
On the other hand, experiencing a sense of freedom is a crucial human right. If professionals had been forced to work in their birth countries, the chances would be high that they feel deprived of freedom. These feelings cam discourage them to perform better in their workplaces, leading to a sharp decrease in expected outcomes. Moreover, individuals like to have the opportunity to expand their knowledge by migrating to different countries. It is obvious that some privileged countries such as developed nations have far better facilities to offer. Take the USA as an example; this wealth country has been offered lots of opportunities to all individuals to hone their skills, making people keen to migrate there to benefit from these chances.
On the other hand, freedom of movement is a fundamental human right. Forcing professionals to work in their birth countries could make them feel restricted, potentially diminishing their motivation and work performance. Furthermore, migration offers valuable opportunities for professional growth. Developed nations often provide superior facilities and resources for skill development. The United States, for instance, offers numerous opportunities for individuals to enhance their expertise, making it an attractive destination for ambitious professionals.
To sum up, although I acknowledge that professionals' migration can cause some difficulties like financial crises, I wholeheartedly believe that they should be allowed to choose their country freely.
In conclusion, while I recognize that professional migration can create challenges such as economic strain, I strongly maintain that individuals should retain the right to choose their country of work freely.