Balang
  • Home
  • Speaking
  • Blog
lemon logo
Balang is committed to revolutionizing language learning, empowering individuals worldwide to achieve their aspirations through innovative technology and personalized education.
Terms of ServicePrivacy PolicyRefund Policy
Contact
Email
telegram logo
Telegram

Question: In the future, nobody will buy printed newspapers or books because they will be able to re...

Click on red question marks (?) to see an explanation for each change. Some changes are only suggestions and don't mean the original is necessarily wrong.
In fact, the internet has effectedaffected our reading habits. People will be are able to read everything online without purchasepurchasing or wastewasting money on newspapers or books. I completely agree with this statement. There are some great advantages to online reading. First, people can access books in all over the world. This is because of for an important reason. For example, in the past, people had to wait for newspapers or new versionversions of books to read, but nowadays they can read everything online without paying. In addition to, online reading dodoes not damage the environment. This is because, on the one hand, governmentgovernments do not need to recycle paperspaper, itwhich will be help the economy. On the other hand, when people read everything online, governmentgovernments do not cutecut down any trees. Nature can breathbreathe, and it will not damage itbe damaged more and more. Therefore, online reading not only accessallows people to read everything, but also dodoes not damage the environment. However, some people argue that, if people pay money for newspapers or books, itthey will read itthem line by line, in. In other words, that means when everyone pay pays, that thing will be valuable for them to read, it or maybe people can keep books in a library to show everyone. Hence, some people argue that paypaying money, it makes a supernatural library to keep books. In conclusion, although some people argue that keepkeeping books or newspapers, it will be makes them valuable for them, there are some undeniable benefits to online reading, including the protection of the environment and allowing people who livedlive all over the world canto access to them. Therefore, iamI am in complete agreement with this statement.
This section presents vocabulary suggestions. Highlighted words are either too simple or are repeated more than 3 times . Please note that some suggested alternatives might require changes to other parts of the sentence.
This section presents a professionally wirtten variation of your essay and highlights the differences.
In fact, internet has effected our reading habits. People will be able to read everything online without purchase or waste money on newspapers or books. I completely agree with this statement.
The internet has significantly affected our reading habits. People can now access everything online without purchasing or spending money on newspapers or books. I completely agree with this statement.
There are some great advantages to online reading. First, people can access books in all over the world. This is because of an important reason. For example, in the past, people had to wait for newspapers or new version of books to read , but nowadays they can read everything online without paying. In addition to, online reading do not damage the environment. This is because, on the one hand , government do not need to recycle papers, it will be help economy. On the other hand, when people read everything online, government do not cute any trees. Nature can breath, it will not damage it more and more. Therefore, online reading not only access people to read everything, but also do not damage the environment.
There are several advantages to online reading. First, people can access books from all over the world. In the past, individuals had to wait for newspapers or new book editions, but now they can read everything online without paying. Additionally, online reading is environmentally friendly. Governments no longer need to recycle paper, which benefits the economy. Moreover, since people read online, fewer trees are cut down, allowing nature to thrive without further damage. Therefore, online reading not only provides universal access to reading materials but also protects the environment.
However, some people argue that, if people pay money for newspapers or books, it will read it line by line, in other words, that means when everyone pay , that thing will be valuable for them to read it or maybe people can keep books in a library to show everyone. Hence, some people argue that pay money, it makes supernatural library to keep books.
However, some argue that paying for newspapers or books encourages careful reading. They claim that when people invest money, they value the content more and may read it thoroughly. Others suggest that physical books can be preserved in libraries for public display, creating a valuable collection.
In conclusion, although some people argue that keep books or newspapers, it will be valuable for them, there are some undeniable benefits to online reading, including protection of environment and people who lived all over the world can access to them. Therefore, iam in complete agreement with this statement .
In conclusion, while some believe physical books and newspapers hold greater value, the undeniable benefits of online reading—such as environmental protection and global accessibility—make it a superior option. Therefore, I fully support this perspective.
See more samples for this topic
Check your essay for this topic
Overall Band Score
5
Overview
Vocabulary Range
average
Linking Words
average
Spelling
weak
Grammar Accuracy
weak
Grammar Range
average
Cohesion
average
Paragraph Structure
average
Task Response
strong
Word Count
sufficient
While we are confident in our score estimation, you are not guaranteed to receive the same score in an official test.

Feedback on Your Essay

Task Achievement

  • Position Clarity: Your position is clear—you agree with the statement. However, the argument could be more nuanced. While you present advantages of online reading, the counterargument (printed books/newspapers being valuable) is not fully developed.
  • Supporting Ideas: Some points are strong (e.g., environmental benefits, global access), but others lack depth. For example, the economic argument about recycling is unclear.
  • Examples: The examples provided (waiting for newspapers vs. instant online access) are relevant but could be expanded. The environmental argument is good but needs clearer reasoning.
  • Conclusion: Restates your position but could summarize key points more effectively.

Coherence and Cohesion

  • Logical Flow: The essay has a basic structure (introduction, advantages, counterargument, conclusion), but transitions between ideas are sometimes abrupt.
  • Linking Words: Some linking words are used (e.g., "First," "In addition to," "However"), but others are misused ("In addition to" should be "Additionally").
  • Paragraphing: The counterargument paragraph is underdeveloped and could be merged with the conclusion for better flow.

Lexical Resource

  • Word Choice: Some words are incorrectly used ("effected" should be "affected," "cute" should be "cut").
  • Repetition: "Do not damage the environment" is repeated; synonyms or rephrasing would help.
  • Formality: Some phrases are too informal ("Nature can breath," "supernatural library").

Grammatical Range and Accuracy

  • Sentence Structure: Some sentences are awkward or unclear (e.g., "government do not need to recycle papers, it will be help economy").
  • Subject-Verb Agreement: Errors like "government do not" (should be "government does not").
  • Articles/Prepositions: Missing or incorrect (e.g., "access people" should be "allow people," "in all over the world" should be "all over the world").

Suggestions for Improvement

  1. Expand Counterarguments: Explain why some people prefer printed materials (e.g., focus, nostalgia, collectibility).
  2. Clarify Examples: Provide specific data or studies on environmental benefits.
  3. Improve Grammar: Review subject-verb agreement and article usage.
  4. Use More Precise Vocabulary: Replace informal phrases with academic terms.
  5. Smooth Transitions: Use cohesive devices (e.g., "Moreover," "Conversely") to improve flow.

Your essay has potential but needs refinement in clarity, grammar, and depth of argument. Keep practicing!