Balang
  • Home
  • Speaking
  • Blog
lemon logo
Balang is committed to revolutionizing language learning, empowering individuals worldwide to achieve their aspirations through innovative technology and personalized education.
Terms of ServicePrivacy PolicyRefund Policy
Contact
Email
telegram logo
Telegram

Question: Some university students want to learn about other subjects in addition to their main subj...

Click on red question marks (?) to see an explanation for each change. Some changes are only suggestions and don't mean the original is necessarily wrong.
Students attend university to improve their prospects and find suitable employment after graduation. For this reason, some feel that they should focus all their energy on their mainprimary subjects to gain a relevant qualification. Others want a more well-rounded education, so they try to learn about additional subjects. It is perfectly reasonable for students to enter university with a strong sense of curiosity and a desire to learn as much as possible. Unfortunately, we tend to put subjects into artificial boxes, suggesting that business, art and science are not connected. If students become too focused on a single area, it may stifle their initial curiosity, limiting their potential. They could also graduate with a very narrow skill set that doesn't translate well to the current job market, which often favours those who have taken a multidisciplinary approach to their studies. Despite this, caution is certainly needed. The more we learn about a subject, the more complex it becomes. Gaining an in-depth, specialist knowledge of a subject requires a certain level of focus and dedication over a long period. If we try to learn about too many things at once, our Knowledgeknowledge may lack the depth required to obtain a qualification. If they are not careful, young people could begin to lose interest in their mainprimary subjects, which would be detrimental to their studies. While learning about other subjects is not necessarily a bad thing, I believe university students should ensure that their mainprimary subjects remain the priority so that they do not lose sight of their objective: gaining a qualification. Then they can calculate how much time, energy and headspace they have left for learning about other topics.
This section presents vocabulary suggestions. Highlighted words are either too simple or are repeated more than 3 times . Please note that some suggested alternatives might require changes to other parts of the sentence.
This section presents a professionally wirtten variation of your essay and highlights the differences.
Students attend university to improve their prospects and find suitable employment after graduation. For this reason, some feel that they should focus all their energy on their main subjects to gain a relevant qualification. Others want a more well-rounded education, so they try to learn about additional subjects.
Students attend university to enhance their prospects and secure suitable employment after graduation. For this reason, some believe that they should concentrate all their energy on their primary subjects to obtain a relevant qualification. Others, however, advocate for a more well-rounded education and strive to learn about additional subjects.
It is perfectly reasonable for students to enter university with a strong sense of curiosity and a desire to learn as much as possible. Unfortunately, we tend to put subjects into artificial boxes, suggesting that business, art and science are not connected. If students become too focused on a single area, it may stifle their initial curiosity, limiting their potential. They could also graduate with a very narrow skill set that doesn't translate well to the current job market, which often favours those who have taken a multidisciplinary approach to their studies.
It is entirely reasonable for students to enter university with a strong sense of curiosity and a desire to acquire as much knowledge as possible. Unfortunately, we often categorize subjects into artificial silos, suggesting that business, art, and science are unrelated. If students become overly focused on a single area, it may stifle their initial curiosity and limit their potential. They could also graduate with a narrow skill set that does not translate well to the current job market, which frequently favors those who adopt a multidisciplinary approach to their studies.
Despite this, caution is certainly needed. The more we learn about a subject, the more complex it becomes. Gaining an in-depth, specialist knowledge of a subject requires a certain level of focus and dedication over a long period. If we try to learn about too many things at once, our Knowledge may lack the depth required to obtain a qualification. If they are not careful, young people could begin to lose interest in their main subjects, which would be detrimental to their studies.
Nevertheless, caution is certainly warranted. The more we delve into a subject, the more complex it becomes. Acquiring in-depth, specialized knowledge requires a significant level of focus and dedication over an extended period. If students attempt to learn about too many topics simultaneously, their understanding may lack the depth necessary to achieve a qualification. If they are not careful, young people could begin to lose interest in their primary subjects, which would be detrimental to their academic progress.
While learning about other subjects is not necessarily a bad thing, I believe university students should ensure that their main subjects remain the priority so that they do not lose sight of their objective: gaining a qualification. Then they can calculate how much time, energy and headspace they have left for learning about other topics.
While exploring other subjects is not inherently negative, I believe university students should prioritize their main subjects to ensure they do not lose sight of their objective: obtaining a qualification. Subsequently, they can assess how much time, energy, and mental space they have available for learning about additional topics.
See more samples for this topic
Check your essay for this topic
Overall Band Score
8
Overview
Vocabulary Range
strong
Linking Words
strong
Spelling
strong
Grammar Accuracy
strong
Grammar Range
strong
Cohesion
strong
Paragraph Structure
strong
Task Response
strong
Word Count
sufficient
While we are confident in our score estimation, you are not guaranteed to receive the same score in an official test.

Task Achievement

The essay effectively addresses the prompt by discussing both views on whether university students should focus solely on their main subjects or explore additional subjects. The writer provides a balanced discussion, presenting arguments for both sides and concluding with a clear personal opinion. The response is relevant and adequately developed, meeting the task requirements.

Coherence and Cohesion

The essay is well-organized, with a clear introduction, body paragraphs discussing each viewpoint, and a conclusion that states the writer's opinion. The use of cohesive devices such as "for this reason," "unfortunately," "despite this," and "while" helps to guide the reader through the argument. However, the transition between the second and third paragraphs could be smoother to enhance the overall flow of ideas.

Lexical Resource

The writer demonstrates a good range of vocabulary, using terms like "well-rounded education," "multidisciplinary approach," "in-depth, specialist knowledge," and "detrimental." The vocabulary is appropriate for the topic and is used accurately. There are no noticeable errors in word choice or usage, indicating a strong lexical resource.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy

The essay exhibits a variety of sentence structures, including complex and compound sentences, which contribute to the clarity and sophistication of the writing. The grammar is generally accurate, with only minor errors, such as the unnecessary capitalization of "Knowledge" in the third paragraph. Overall, the grammatical range and accuracy are commendable.

Suggestions for Improvement

  1. Coherence and Cohesion: Improve the transition between the second and third paragraphs to enhance the logical flow of ideas. Consider using a linking sentence or phrase to connect the discussion of the benefits of a multidisciplinary approach with the potential drawbacks of losing focus on main subjects.

  2. Grammatical Accuracy: Correct the capitalization error in the third paragraph ("Knowledge" should be "knowledge").

  3. Expansion: While the essay is well-developed, consider providing specific examples or evidence to support the arguments, which could strengthen the discussion and make it more persuasive.

Overall, the essay effectively addresses the task, demonstrating a good command of language and a clear understanding of the topic. With minor improvements, it could be even more compelling and cohesive.