This section presents a professionally wirtten variation of your essay and highlights the differences.
Some people think that processed food and drink products include a considerable amount of sugar, which has detrimental impacts on our health condition, and in order to tackle this problem these products should be sold in higher prices. While I agree that making them costly can be benefitial to a certain extend, I believe raising awareness and accessing organic food are be better solutions.
Some people argue that processed food and drink products contain excessive amounts of sugar, which has detrimental effects on health, and that increasing their prices could help address this issue. While I agree that higher prices may be beneficial to some extent, I believe raising public awareness and improving access to organic food are more effective long-term solutions.
On the one hand, governments can impose heavy taxes on manufacturers, which produce food and beverages containing significant sugar proportion. Therefore, companies reflect this high taxes on their products and will sell them more expensively, so people only would by these foods only on special occasions and events. People gradually consume these products less because they do not wish to waste a lot of mony on sugary products and this contributes to improving public health.
On the one hand, governments could impose higher taxes on manufacturers producing sugary food and beverages. As a result, companies would pass these costs onto consumers, making such products more expensive. This could discourage frequent consumption, as people may only purchase them occasionally rather than as part of their daily diet. Over time, reduced consumption of sugary products could contribute to better public health.
On the other hand, educaing people would have more sustainable benefits on our health. Theaching children initially from school will lead them to a better understanding of the food they use, and raising the awaraness of their parents through campaigns would be beneficial for the whole family. The reason is that children will learn from their parents and preserve this healthy lifestyle when they become adults.
On the other hand, education campaigns would have a more sustainable impact on health. Teaching children about nutrition in schools would help them make informed dietary choices, while raising awareness among parents through public health initiatives would benefit entire families. Since children often adopt their parents' habits, early education could foster lifelong healthy eating behaviors.
Furthermore, increasing the accessibility to healthy organic food can be an advantagous way for enhancing public diet and lifestyle. The more people consume highly nutrisious food, the more healthy they become. By assisting farmers and their products, selling them at a lower price, and making them easier to access for general people, the false habit of eating sugary foods will disappear eventually, and people adopt a healthy lifestyle. In this way, the roots of the problem will be indicated.
Furthermore, improving access to organic and nutritious food would encourage healthier diets. If governments support local farmers, subsidize organic products, and make them more affordable and accessible, people would be more likely to choose them over processed alternatives. Over time, this shift could reduce reliance on sugary foods and promote long-term well-being.
In conclusion, making sugary foods and drinks expensive will be effective only to some extend. However, there are more practical ways for improving public health, such as education and organic food.
In conclusion, while increasing the price of sugary products may have some benefits, education and better access to healthy food are more effective solutions for improving public health.