Question: In some countries, there is an increasing trend of people working remotely rather than com...
You are on the free tier, which uses free AI models. They can occasionally be slow, unstable, or temporarily unavailable. Balang Plus uses premium models for faster, more reliable, and higher-quality marking.
Task Response: You clearly state your position and address both sides, but the development of ideas is uneven. The second body paragraph (disadvantages) is underdeveloped; the example regarding conferences feels disconnected from daily remote work, and the rebuttal ("spendings are compensated with profit") is vague and does not directly address the loss of networking opportunities.
Coherence & Cohesion: The structure is logical with clear paragraphing. However, cohesive devices are sometimes mechanical ("On the other hand," "As a result"). Referencing errors occur ("these spendings" refers to nothing previously mentioned). The conclusion introduces "corporates rely on internet-based meetings," which narrows the topic (remote work ≠ only meetings).
Lexical Resource: You use some good collocations ("minimizing company expenditure," "career path"), but there are frequent spelling/word formation errors: "out weight" (outweigh), "confrences" (conferences), "workforce" (singular verb needed), "job prospect" (prospects). Phrases like "pay a fortune" are slightly informal.
Grammatical Range & Accuracy: You attempt complex sentences, but punctuation errors (comma splices, missing commas after introductory clauses) and subject-verb agreement issues ("workforce do not") reduce clarity. The phrase "saving time decreased expenses" lacks a conjunction or preposition.
Key Improvements: