Question: Some people think that competition at work, at school, and in daily life is a good thing. ...
The essay addresses the prompt by discussing both views on competition and cooperation. It provides a clear opinion, favoring competition, and supports this stance with relevant examples, such as the story of Murlikant Petkar. However, the essay could benefit from a more balanced discussion by providing a stronger counterargument for cooperation. Additionally, the conclusion could be expanded to reinforce the main points discussed in the body paragraphs.
The essay is generally well-organized, with a clear introduction, body paragraphs, and conclusion. The use of linking words and phrases, such as "admittedly," "firstly," "secondly," and "however," helps to guide the reader through the argument. However, the transition between the discussion of cooperation and competition could be smoother. The essay would benefit from more cohesive devices to connect ideas within paragraphs and between them.
The essay demonstrates a good range of vocabulary, with appropriate use of terms like "holistic solution," "biased viewpoints," "thriving community," and "insatiable appetite for competition." However, there are some minor errors, such as "pale the benefits," which should be "diminish the benefits." Additionally, the essay could benefit from more varied vocabulary to enhance the richness of the language used.
The essay generally uses a range of grammatical structures accurately, including complex sentences. However, there are some minor errors, such as the lowercase "i" in "i have an inclination" and the incorrect use of "dissuade people from hard working," which should be "dissuade people from working hard." These errors do not significantly impede understanding but should be corrected for greater accuracy.
Overall, the essay presents a clear argument with relevant examples but could benefit from a more balanced discussion and improved cohesion.