Question: In many countries around the world, rural people are moving to cities, so the population i...
Marking Generated by Free AI Models
You are on the free tier, which uses free AI models. They can occasionally be slow, unstable, or temporarily unavailable. Balang Plus uses premium models for faster, more reliable, and higher-quality marking.
Click on red question marks (?) to see an explanation for each change. Some changes are only suggestions and don't mean the original is necessarily wrong.
Nowadays a large number of individuals from suburbs are moving to cities in numerous countries. As a result, the number of people who are living in the countryside is dwindling. This change has its own pros and cons; however, I believe the negative impacts of this action outweigh the benefits. This essay explains the drawbacks of the increasing immigrationmigration to cities.
To begin with, the first impact of moving to cities effects on developmentsaffects the development of rural places. When people move to cities, and the number of residents in suburbs decreasedecreases, there will be less demand for developments,development and providing more public facilities. As a result, the government will not assign a budget for developmentsdevelopment in these areas, and people who are living over there will experience difficult situations. For instance, when fewer people live in rural areaareas, the new roads will not establish definitelybe established, besides,and the old roads will not be maintained in most cases. In this situation, the communication will become a serious problem for local people.
It is widely accepted that this issue has negative impacts on cities. For instance, the rise ofin population in cities increase the increasesair pollution, traffic, and noise, especially in big cities. Therefore, individuals in cities ought to struggle with problems such as living in crowded places, driving in rush hours, and spending a lot of time in traffic. In this circumstance, the unsatisfaction ofdissatisfaction with life will increase drastically.
It is obviously considerableimportant that the government ought to overcome new obstacles like providing new public facilities for a greater number of societiesresidents in some cities in a short time. Although at the first glance it would be a progress to create new facilities like schools, healthcare services, and hospitals, it would be a challenge for the government to manage the crowded cities, and due to the increase in mismanagingmismanagement, people will live in chaos in some areas.
In conclusion, I claim that the increasing ofincrease in the number of people who tend to live in cities has several disadvantages, and people who are thosein charge have to set rules to control the number of immigrationsmigrations to cities.
While we are confident in our score estimation, you are not guaranteed to receive the same score in an official test.
Feedback
Task Achievement
Response to the Prompt: The essay addresses the prompt by discussing both the positive and negative aspects of rural to urban migration, ultimately concluding that the negatives outweigh the positives. This aligns well with the task requirement.
Position: Your position is clear throughout the essay, as you consistently argue that the negative impacts of rural depopulation and urban overpopulation are significant.
Examples and Explanation: You provide relevant examples, such as the lack of infrastructure development in rural areas and increased pollution in cities, to support your arguments. However, more specific examples or data could strengthen your points further.
Coherence and Cohesion
Organization: The essay is well-organized with a clear introduction, body paragraphs, and conclusion. Each paragraph focuses on a specific aspect of the issue.
Cohesive Devices: You use cohesive devices effectively to link ideas within and between paragraphs (e.g., "To begin with," "For instance," "In conclusion"). However, some transitions could be smoother. For example, the transition between discussing rural and urban impacts could be more explicit.
Lexical Resource
Vocabulary: The vocabulary used is appropriate and varied. Words like "dwindling," "unsatisfaction," and "chaos" are used effectively. However, "unsatisfaction" is not a standard English word; "dissatisfaction" would be more appropriate.
Word Choice: Some word choices could be improved for clarity and precision. For example, "suburbs" is typically used to describe areas on the outskirts of a city, not rural areas.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy
Sentence Structure: You demonstrate a good range of sentence structures, including complex sentences. However, some sentences are awkwardly constructed or contain minor grammatical errors. For example, "the first impact of moving to cities effects on developments of rural places" could be rephrased for clarity.
Grammar: There are a few grammatical errors, such as subject-verb agreement issues ("government will not assign budget" should be "the government will not assign a budget") and article usage ("the new roads will not establish definitely" should be "new roads will not be established").
Suggestions for Improvement
Provide More Specific Examples: Incorporate specific examples or data to strengthen your arguments.
Improve Transitions: Work on making transitions between ideas smoother to enhance the flow of the essay.
Refine Vocabulary and Grammar: Pay attention to word choice and grammatical accuracy, particularly with articles and subject-verb agreement.
Clarify Sentence Structure: Review and revise sentences for clarity and conciseness to improve readability.
Overall, the essay effectively addresses the prompt and presents a clear argument, but there is room for improvement in terms of language precision and coherence.