Question: Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation, such as an unsatisfactory j...
The essay addresses both views and presents a clear opinion, which aligns with the prompt. However, the response could be more balanced in discussing the opposing view before presenting the writer’s stance. Some arguments lack depth—for example, the discussion on why people might accept a bad situation could be expanded with more concrete examples or reasoning. The conclusion is clear but somewhat abrupt.
The essay has a logical structure, but some transitions between ideas are weak. For instance, the shift from discussing why people stay in unsatisfactory jobs to arguing for taking risks feels abrupt. Additionally, some sentences are overly long and could be broken down for better readability. The use of cohesive devices (e.g., "On the other hand," "In conclusion") is present but could be more varied and natural.
There is a mix of appropriate vocabulary (e.g., "endeavor," "perseverance," "economic ventures"), but some word choices are awkward or incorrect (e.g., "undesired occasion" instead of "undesirable situation," "persevearence" instead of "perseverance"). Some phrases are repetitive (e.g., "take risks" is used multiple times without variation). More precise and sophisticated vocabulary would improve the lexical score.
There are several grammatical errors, including:
While complex sentences are attempted, some are unclear due to grammatical mistakes. Proofreading for subject-verb agreement, articles, and prepositions would help.
Overall, the essay presents a clear opinion but would benefit from more balanced arguments, refined grammar, and stronger cohesion.