Question: Some people say that advertising is extremely successful at persuading us to buy things. O...
The essay addresses both views and presents a clear opinion, fulfilling the task requirements. However, the argument could be more balanced. The first view (advertising being persuasive) is not explored in depth—only the opposing view (advertising being ineffective) is discussed. Adding a stronger counterargument would improve task achievement.
Some points lack development. For example, the claim that "people have learned about advertising tricks" needs more evidence or explanation. The Amazon example is relevant but could be expanded to show how advertising fails to influence buyers.
The essay has a logical structure, with clear paragraphs for each main idea. However, some transitions between ideas are abrupt. For instance, the shift from discussing awareness to advertising overload could be smoother.
Some sentences are awkwardly phrased, affecting clarity:
Repetition weakens cohesion (e.g., "advertising" is overused; synonyms like "marketing" or "promotions" could help).
Word choice is sometimes unnatural or incorrect:
Collocations are occasionally misused:
A wider range of vocabulary (e.g., "consumer skepticism," "market saturation") would strengthen lexical resource.
Several grammatical errors affect clarity:
Sentence structures are sometimes repetitive (e.g., frequent use of "we have"). More complex structures (e.g., conditionals, passive voice) would improve variety.
Overall, the essay presents a clear stance but would benefit from deeper analysis, better-supported examples, and improved language accuracy.